tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post114124213300995476..comments2023-09-22T13:45:50.991-04:00Comments on Ohio Media Watch: And Some Speculation FollowupOhio Media Watchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07003503894299610300noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post-1141698811104914752006-03-06T21:33:00.000-05:002006-03-06T21:33:00.000-05:00Sorry to be so late to the party, gentlemen. Yes,...Sorry to be so late to the party, gentlemen. Yes, I'm quite sure that WTAM will be in a big hurry to get rid of both Limbaugh and Trivisonno, seeing as how they do so poorly in the ratings.<BR/><BR/>As for Gilmore, he was the perfect Sunday night host, mostly because I don't happen to listen to radio at that time.Marc with a "c"https://www.blogger.com/profile/05173420772528767189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post-1141583488896656392006-03-05T13:31:00.000-05:002006-03-05T13:31:00.000-05:00Wow, til you mentioned it, I hadn't noticed that R...Wow, til you mentioned it, I hadn't noticed that Rick Gilmore wasn't on WTAM anymore. Replaced, instead, by that lunatic McCoy BUFFOON.<BR/><BR/>I wouldn't sit thru 5 minutes of Springer...Limbaugh (truly awful)...and Trivisonno on most days. I only click to WTAM between 3 and 7 if I'm in the car and all of the other stations have a commercial playing. This overblown piece of lard is a great demonstration of how hard-up the market is for a good afternoon host. The fact that he has ANY rating whatsoever reinforces the stupidity of Clevelanders. Period. <BR/><BR/>Rick Gilmore would be a welcome addition to any time slot. I always enjoyed him on Sunday nights, and I'm constantly amazed that a large station like WTAM would sink so low as to stick a convict on the air. Rest assured, they're using those two hours as their "public service / minority" requirement for the FCC. If it's for any other reason...oh my.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post-1141273528289412012006-03-01T23:25:00.000-05:002006-03-01T23:25:00.000-05:00"Succient" isn't a word.Or is that another one of ..."Succient" isn't a word.<BR/><BR/>Or is that another one of your "I never spell anything wrong" feats of strength?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post-1141250429033321892006-03-01T17:00:00.000-05:002006-03-01T17:00:00.000-05:00where is gillyhe was entertainingis he still in ra...where is gilly<BR/><BR/>he was entertaining<BR/><BR/>is he still in radio<BR/><BR/>p.s. dump hush bimbo<BR/><BR/>note to self: succient, yet great postAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post-1141248505751013782006-03-01T16:28:00.000-05:002006-03-01T16:28:00.000-05:00Jim,Once again, it's spelled "Gilly." That's from...Jim,<BR/><BR/>Once again, it's spelled "Gilly." That's from the man himself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13975530.post-1141244461673267852006-03-01T15:21:00.000-05:002006-03-01T15:21:00.000-05:00bob frantz = boringhush bimbo = boringbob frantz =...bob frantz = boring<BR/><BR/>hush bimbo = boring<BR/><BR/>bob frantz = hush bimbo<BR/><BR/>dump hush bimbo<BR/><BR/>bring back gilleyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com